diff options
author | Jakob Kaivo <jkk@ung.org> | 2022-03-04 12:32:20 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jakob Kaivo <jkk@ung.org> | 2022-03-04 12:32:20 -0500 |
commit | 55f277e77428d7423ae906a8e1f1324d35b07a7d (patch) | |
tree | 5c1c04703dff89c46b349025d2d3ec88ea9b3819 /miralib/ex/refoliate.m |
import Miranda 2.066 from upstream
Diffstat (limited to 'miralib/ex/refoliate.m')
-rw-r--r-- | miralib/ex/refoliate.m | 60 |
1 files changed, 60 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/miralib/ex/refoliate.m b/miralib/ex/refoliate.m new file mode 100644 index 0000000..028f362 --- /dev/null +++ b/miralib/ex/refoliate.m @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ +> tree ::= Leaf num | Fork tree tree + +PROBLEM: write down the definition of a function which takes a tree and +returns a tree of the SAME SHAPE, containing the same data, but with the +leaves moved around so that the data appears in ascending order, when +the tree is scanned from left to right. + +> reorder :: tree->tree +> reorder t = refoliate t (sort (fringe t)) + +Our idea here is that `fringe' extracts a list of all the data in the +tree, while `refoliate' takes a tree and a list of data, and replaces +the leaves of the tree with the given data, preserving the shape of the +tree. We define fringe first, as it is the easiest. + +> fringe :: tree->[num] +> fringe (Leaf n) = [n] +> fringe (Fork s t) = fringe s ++ fringe t + +Aside - there is a trivial change to the last line which alters the +behaviour of fringe so that the call to sort is no longer necessary. We +can replace `++' by a call to the library function `merge'. This would +improve the efficiency of the solution. + +We define `refoliate' in terms of an auxiliary function which takes a +subtree and the list of replacement data, and returns a pair - the +refoliated subtree, and the unused part of the list. + +> refoliate :: tree->[num]->tree +> refoliate t x = fst (refol t x) + +> refol :: tree->[num]->(tree,[num]) +> refol (Leaf n) (a:x) = (Leaf a,x) +> refol (Fork s t) x = (Fork s1 t1,x'') +> where +> (s1,x') = refol s x +> (t1,x'') = refol t x' + +Here is an example tree on which to call `reorder', to see that the +algorithm works. + +> t1 = mktree [19,0,17,2,15,4,13,6,11,8,9,10,7,12,5,14,3,16,1,18] + +mktree takes a list and builds a (well-balanced) tree from it. + +> mktree :: [num]->tree +> mktree [] = error "cannot have empty tree" +> mktree [a] = Leaf a +> mktree x = Fork (mktree (take n x)) (mktree (drop n x)) +> where n = # x div 2 + +Finally, we define a function same_shape, which can be used to confirm +that reorder holds the shape constant. + +> same_shape :: tree->tree->bool +> same_shape (Leaf a) (Leaf b) = True +> same_shape (Fork s t) (Fork s1 t1) = same_shape s s1 & same_shape t t1 +> same_shape s t = False ||all other cases + +> test = same_shape t1 (reorder t1) |